On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 13:17, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/13/20 7:03 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/13/20 10:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 12/11/20 5:04 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> On 12/12/20 12:12 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:

> Seem reasonable?  I was able to install the resulting qpdf-devel fine.

Don't forget to move the following metadata to the main package:

   Summary: Development files for QPDF library
   Requires: qpdf-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}


Do you mean the main package as qpdf ? We don't control that package. 
 
Also, since you might want to bump the release independently in EPEL (e.g. if we
discover something was wrong in the way we have packaged this), I recommend doing:

   %global rhelrelease 10
   %global baserelease 1
   Release: %{rhelrelease}.%{baserelease}%{?dist}
   ...
   Requires: qpdf-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{rhelrelease}%{?dist}

(Assuming qpdf has regular %{dist} and not some modularity artificial value.)

Note that I've named the EPEL part of the release "baserelease", so
rpmdev-bumpspec does the right thing.


That makes sense.
 
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


--
Stephen J Smoogen.