On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 6:50 AM Petr Pisar <ppisar@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:00:42PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> To solve this problem, I am proposing that we create a new repository called
> EPEL 8 Next.
> - built against CentOS 8 Stream
> - opt-in for packagers (must request epel8-next dist-git branch)
> - opt-in for users (part of epel-release but disabled by default)
> - used *with* epel8, not *instead of*
I agree with all of that. I only don't like the name. Why EPEL 8 Next? If it
is to be use with Stream, why don't we call it EPEL 8 Stream? I think the
meaning of the repository would be easier to understand.

I was thinking the same thing. EPEL stream is so much easier for users to understand.

- Ken