On 31.07.2007 22:19, Karsten Wade wrote:
It's IMHO accurate, but they wording maybe could be improved.
If so, what do we want to say instead?
"We are doing EPEL4 and if you look for a SRPM to take as base besides
looking at the FC-3 branch please also take a look at those from
http://centos.karan.org/, as those packages are known to work for EL4
and tested there. "
CU
thl