rob myers wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 02:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> rob myers wrote:
> If the Fedora
>> maintainer later decides to participate in EPEL, and more than one month
>> has passed, the EPEL maintainer of the package should strongly consider
>> returning maintainership, but does not have to.
> Looks better but I would suggest recommending co-maintainership rather
> than a complete hand off. If a Fedora package maintainer has shown no
> interest when asked and a new maintainer has taken over and been working
> on EPEL which has a different release strategy and policies then it is
> better than the existing maintainer in EPEL work together with the
> Fedora maintainer and help in any transition process or continue as a team.
how about if we reword the last bit to be "... should strongly consider
co-maintainership, but does not have to."
Yes, that would work.