Will there be co-maintainers, Provenpackagers in the Playground repo?
Proposal: Yes, there must be commaintainers and provenpackagers. If we use softwarecollections.org software we might be able to add to one copr repo more users who can maintain it. We can just copy Fedora provenpackagers list.
Let's use the same system, which we used for approval of Playground repo: mirroring. No disapproval on mailing list means approval on next meeting.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draft...
On 03/26/2014 08:05 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Will there be co-maintainers, Provenpackagers in the Playground repo?
Proposal: Yes, there must be commaintainers and provenpackagers. If we use softwarecollections.org software we might be able to add to one copr repo more users who can maintain it. We can just copy Fedora provenpackagers list.
+1 That makes sense to me. Provenpackagers have already some higher level of trust, so I don't see any reason to create non-necessary work to create some new apparatus.
We may talk about creating some new Playground SIG, so pure Playground provenpackagers don't have to become provenpackagers some other way (like joining some other SIG).
Honza
Let's use the same system, which we used for approval of Playground repo: mirroring. No disapproval on mailing list means approval on next meeting.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draft...
env-and-stacks mailing list env-and-stacks@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 07:53 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
We may talk about creating some new Playground SIG, so pure Playground provenpackagers don't have to become provenpackagers some other way (like joining some other SIG).
Agreed. Currently, becoming a provenpackager for the main Fedora repository is quite hard (and it should stay that way), but we might lower our criteria/expectations for *Playground provenpackagers* and at the same time automatically extend the rights of *main repo provenpackagers* to the Playground repo.
The process for becoming a Playground provenpackager could be similar to the current process of becoming a provenpackager [1], just that FESCo would be replaced with our WG or a new Playground SIG.
Tadej
env-and-stacks@lists.fedoraproject.org