On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 11:13:03AM -0500, John Dulaney wrote:
Putting on my QA hat here, I think that we need to ensure that packages run through full depcheck rather than just get checked for conflicts.
Sounds reasonable.
In fact, they should run through the full automation process once we that up and running.
Also sounds good, although depending on what those tests are some failures could be warnings rather than blockers.
Also, I do not believe that we should ever have a package in our distro that does not meet licensing. If Fedora even hints at shipping non-open source software, then you're going to drive a bunch of people away.
Agreed -- this would be quite a few steps beyond a third-party repo. License compliance is required for COPRs, and this is a step more towards the center of Fedora than that.