On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 12:28 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 23:12 +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> unsigned long int is not always capable to have pointer in some cases
> (LLP64, for example).
This makes sense, but it does change a public API. One we share with
other libelf implementations. So I'll like to discuss this first to make
sure this doesn't break something subtle.
Discussion finally done. I have added a ChangeLog entry and updated the
documentation a bit. Committed as attached to master now.