A patch implementing $SUBJ is sitting on pmachata/pending. So there are now two patches, the other one being the locale bit. I don't know how hard it is to cherry-pick single commit and merge it, shall I create a separate branch for each issue next time?
PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Petr Machata wrote:
A patch implementing $SUBJ is sitting on pmachata/pending. So there are now two patches, the other one being the locale bit.
I've cherry-picked the strtab change.
The locale change really shouldn't be necessary. If you see the need fix the locale instead.
And now back t PTO...
- -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
06.08.2009 19:19, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
The locale change really shouldn't be necessary. If you see the need fix the locale instead.
The thing is that it returns empty string even for LANG=C. In libc, localedata/locales/POSIX and most of localedata/locales/en_* don't define "yesstr" and "nostr" entries. Also we already use gettext to emit yes/no string for has_children in print_debug_abbrev_section.
But I've also filed a libc bug... whichever way it gets fixed is fine by me. http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10497
PM
A patch implementing $SUBJ is sitting on pmachata/pending. So there are now two patches, the other one being the locale bit. I don't know how hard it is to cherry-pick single commit and merge it, shall I create a separate branch for each issue next time?
It's not hard to cherry-pick, but it prevents you merging again later. IMHO it is better to use a temporary branch for each unrelated thing. But it is not a big issue.
elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
-
Petr Machata -
Roland McGrath -
Ulrich Drepper