Mark Wielaard <mjw(a)redhat.com> writes:
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 22:29 +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
> How's this for a counter-proposal? I shamelessly reused your commit
> message and ChangeLog wording, please let me know if that's overstepping
No it isn't. And thanks for the proposal.
But I think I prefer the fix using multiplication as posted here:
That one is also just a oneliner and more generic since it doesn't rely
on having to cast to uint64_t. And Richard checked it still just
generates a shift.
Ah, cool, I didn't notice that e-mail.