Josh Stone <jistone(a)redhat.com> writes:
On 11/25/2015 08:00 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Previously this was incorrectly assumed to be an ULEB128. Hilarity
> ensued.
Is the error visible in any testcase? Or can you add a test?
I didn't see any effect on any existing tests. New test coming.
Cheers,
- Ben