Hi -
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:53:12PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
[...]
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0 0x00000000100004d0 in .f ()
> > > #1 0x0000000010000500 in .main ()
[...]
But I don't see why that has to leak through to the user in a backtrace
where they just want to know which function name corresponds to a
specific address. The extra dot doesn't add any value in this case and
is just confusing.
Not entirely -- the two locations are distinct, and a breakpoint can
pass through one and not the other, which could make a difference to
certain low-level debugging tasks.
- FChE