On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 23:15 +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
... instead of inlining equivalent code.
I didn't know we had that already. I was just contemplating whether to
add something like that. It also gets rid of the DW_TAG_mutable_type
issue (and in a nicer way than I did).
+2014-06-20 Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com>
+
+ * alpha_retval.c (alpha_return_value_location): Call
+ dwarf_peeled_die_type instead of inlining equivalent code.
+ * arm_retval.c (arm_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * i386_retval.c (i386_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * ia64_retval.c (ia64_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * ppc64_retval.c (ppc64_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * ppc_retval.c (ppc_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * s390_retval.c (s390_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * sh_retval.c (sh_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * sparc_retval.c (sparc_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * tilegx_retval.c (tilegx_return_value_location): Likewise.
+ * x86_64_retval.c (x86_64_return_value_location): Likewise.
Looks good. I'll rebase and push my 'Remove non-existing
DW_TAG_mutable_type' patch after this goes in.
Thanks,
Mark