20.09.2010 18:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:06:39PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Unfortunately it doesn't work too well with trunk gcc because of
> implicit_pointer.
> I've tried to patch
My fault, telling it that DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer has just one operand
obviously isn't a good idea. This one of course works better.
Thanks.
OT, is there a way to request numbers of 0.0% and 100% coverage
separately
(so that 0.1% and 99.99% coverages get attributed to other lines)?
Yes for 100%, not for 0% (it uses normal integer division). I added the
possibility of requesting sharp 0% coverage, you can now use "0.0" as a
tabulation stop. --locstats:tabulate=0.0:10,99 now makes separate
bucket for 0.0, then 0..10 etc and another separate bucket for 100%.
It's on dwarf branch.
PM