On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 09:34 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
after a few retries the build succeeded "unfortunately".
Always annoying when we cannot replicate an issue. Thanks for trying.
For 0.167 we did remove this specific assert from the testcase since it
didn't really provide any useful feedback on what was failing (and in
theory it isn't really "wrong", but it certainly is odd and unexpected).
Lets see if we get different reports about the tests for 0.167.
Thanks,
Mark