On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:27:21 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
O, nice. So our raw backtrace was indeed correct in this case since
the
tail call made the frame disappear.
But GDB should have found the tail call frame. (I did not look at it more.)
> OK for check-in?
Yes, of course.
Checked in: f88863fbb3a7380ad8c7ebcdf6dceb023f3ccf75
Jan