<pedantic> The comment and the return inside the while loop
confusing me at first. It would maybe be slightly easier on the reader
to replace the "return DWARF_END_ABBREV;" with a "break;", so that
"at the end already" logic triggers always instead of only on the second
(or third, etc.) call. </pedantic>
I'm looking at
and I can't see what you're referring to.
Are we talking about the same change?