On 10 Oct 2012, Mark Wielaard uttered the following:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 20:23 +0100, Nick Alcock wrote:
When deciding whether a section is strippable, ebl_section_strip_p() checks the section pointed to by the sh_info of relocation sections to see if the relocated section is strippable.
Unfortunately a one-character typo leads to this check always being skipped. (You can tell it's a typo because if the condition were correct, the next line would dereference a null pointer.)
Signed-off-by: Nick Alcock nick.alcock@oracle.com
Things should have been setup so that you can push this yourself. But I can also do it for you.
Hold off: work said yes about the contributor agreement and then as soon as I'd agreed to it, said 'no, wait for legal'. I'm now acting as if I hadn't agreed to it, and waiting for legal. For weeks and weeks. Even though dozens of people in my department have already signed it. Sigh.
Sorry about this :( I'll rebase against trunk and repost once I'm actually allowed to push this exciting one-character change.