On 04/28/2010 09:49 AM, P J P wrote:
It seriously beats me! You are ready to add a completely new option(ie.
more code, more complexities, will take more time and more of everything else), but can not accept a patch, that is insanely small and neat and serves the purpose.
[...]
GUI doesn't help. I just want three columns of text output symbol name,
their version and library name.
As a user of these tools, not a feudal owner of its development, I think your patch is useful and convenient, and I would be very happy to see it included in the main tree, personally. Thats my personal opinion - non of the contra-arguments given by Ulrich are really productive, imho. From the perspective of a user, its far more useful to have libnames alongside the symbols and not have to go digging around when you're just trying to get work done .. but thats just me.