Re: [patch] Add printing of .gdb_index section to readelf

Hi, Roland -

roland wrote:

...

I'm curious why you think that is a showstopper distinction. What harm would come from teaching eu-readelf how to pretty-print some "non-interchange" formats, if they are reasonably stable, don't require much eu-readelf uglification?

There is no reason to think that .gdb_index format is reasonably stable yet.

OK, let's say arguendo .gdb_index undergoes a few versions over the course of a year. (One may assume that it's self-identifying.) Why not pretty-print them all?

- FChE