21 Apr
2011
21 Apr
'11
4:31 p.m.
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 17:11 +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
Mark Wielaard mjw@redhat.com writes:
For CUs with no associated code and a new enough gcc this will no longer complain when no aranges section is found when the CU doesn't have low_pc set.
I'm not sure. I think that having empty arange section is better, because then it's more explicit.
If you and Tom both agree on that, then lets call it a majority and unblock http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42288 There is already a patch, it doesn't take up a huge amount of space (and the number of no-code CUs is normally low anyway) and it makes more people happy because they feel it is more explicit.
Cheers,
Mark