commit 1b1e295332c177bfe1636811f2bdf55f0200386a
Author: David King <amigadave(a)amigadave.com>
Date: Sat Jul 12 09:31:43 2014 +0100
Fix a couple of typos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118954
Signed-off-by: Eric Christensen <echriste(a)redhat.com>
en-US/Methods.xml | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/en-US/Methods.xml b/en-US/Methods.xml
index 65ffe58..15b3ce9 100644
--- a/en-US/Methods.xml
+++ b/en-US/Methods.xml
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
<section
id="sect-Fedora_Elections_Guide-Range_Voting-Range_Voting_Example">
<title>Range Voting Example</title>
<para>
- To accurately demostrate the concepts of Range Voting in action, it is necessary to
use a fictional election where 7 candidates are standing (Candidates A to G). If three
eligible voters were to choose their level of perference as explained in <xref
linkend="sect-Fedora_Elections_Guide-Range_Voting-Concepts_of_Range_Voting"
/> a data table such as <xref
linkend="tabl-Fedora_Elections_Guide-Range_Voting_Example-Simple_Example_Ballot"
/> can be formed to display the data and demonstrate how a winner would be defined.
+ To accurately demostrate the concepts of Range Voting in action, it is necessary to
use a fictional election where 7 candidates are standing (Candidates A to G). If three
eligible voters were to choose their level of preference as explained in <xref
linkend="sect-Fedora_Elections_Guide-Range_Voting-Concepts_of_Range_Voting"
/> a data table such as <xref
linkend="tabl-Fedora_Elections_Guide-Range_Voting_Example-Simple_Example_Ballot"
/> can be formed to display the data and demonstrate how a winner would be defined.
</para>
<table frame="all"
id="tabl-Fedora_Elections_Guide-Range_Voting_Example-Simple_Example_Ballot">
<title>Simple Example Ballot</title>
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
In this example, Candidate C would be declared the winner with a total vote of 15 as
opposed to Candidate A's 14 votes.
</para>
<para>
- Zero votes have not altered the result due to the summing method been used and can be
intrepreted as the voter having no preference or abstaining.
+ Zero votes have not altered the result due to the summing method being used and can be
intrepreted as the voter having no preference or abstaining.
</para>
</section>