-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I took opportunity to revisit that icon. Small and medium should be clear without a trace of blurriness. Comments welcome.
- -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: luya@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:48 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I took opportunity to revisit that icon. Small and medium should be clear without a trace of blurriness. Comments welcome.
Yup. Both 16x16 and 22x22 are IMHO good now. In 48x48 the transition from borders of the front face to the borders of the top face feels a bit awkward. The slider in 32x32 is harder to discern than in other sizes, and in 256x256 there are still blurry parts here and there and the zipper does not feel very good -- more details would probably help.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 31/01/10 11:14 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:
Yup. Both 16x16 and 22x22 are IMHO good now. In 48x48 the transition from borders of the front face to the borders of the top face feels a bit awkward. The slider in 32x32 is harder to discern than in other sizes, and in 256x256 there are still blurry parts here and there and the zipper does not feel very good -- more details would probably help.
Martin
Hopefully slider in 32x32 is fixed. 256x256 should have less blurry part.
- -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: luya@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
Look really nice :) Take a look on the two smallest sizes - it's very close to be perfect! Good work! :D
// Kris
2010/2/12 Luya Tshimbalanga luya@fedoraproject.org:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 31/01/10 11:14 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:
Yup. Both 16x16 and 22x22 are IMHO good now. In 48x48 the transition from borders of the front face to the borders of the top face feels a bit awkward. The slider in 32x32 is harder to discern than in other sizes, and in 256x256 there are still blurry parts here and there and the zipper does not feel very good -- more details would probably help.
Martin
Hopefully slider in 32x32 is fixed. 256x256 should have less blurry part.
Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: luya@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkt05nUACgkQaS6HaNQHFTnBNgCgizA2ICK8RSL1puA0B5qPPk4/ eeMAnRu45qG7RKarvEHz6wpP8nNPXXMN =hxCz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
echo-icon-theme mailing list echo-icon-theme@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/echo-icon-theme
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 21:26 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 31/01/10 11:14 AM, Martin Sourada wrote:
Yup. Both 16x16 and 22x22 are IMHO good now. In 48x48 the transition from borders of the front face to the borders of the top face feels a bit awkward. The slider in 32x32 is harder to discern than in other sizes, and in 256x256 there are still blurry parts here and there and the zipper does not feel very good -- more details would probably help.
Martin
Hopefully slider in 32x32 is fixed. 256x256 should have less blurry part.
Much, much better. I see you also tweaked the 48x48 -- it's perfect now. The 256x256 might need some work on the zipper and perhaps also the slider to look slightly more realistic. Plus the shadow does not need to be so blurry and big in 256x256. Other than that the icon seems o.k.
Martin
echo-icon-theme@lists.fedorahosted.org