-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2010 03:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 15:04:42 -0400,
"Eric \"Sparks\" Christensen" <sparks(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I was asked, earlier today, why Tor wasn't addressed in the Fedora
> Security Guide. Anyone have any feelings on whether or not addressing
> system would be appropriate for the SG?
I think the context of the security guide is securing your system.
tor isn't really part of that. tor is for providing anonymity, which really
is a separate topic. And to be properly described really needs a manual
of its own. Putting just a brief discussion about tor in with other
security stuff, has the potential to do more harm than good.
Yeah, I understand that. There is a fine line between security and
privacy and to do privacy justice it should probably have a guide of its
own (probably not a Fedora topic).
- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=oKX1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----