On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:17:42 -0400, "Paul W. Frields"
<stickster(a)gmail.com> said:
Sorry if I held it up! :-( But it looks like we're back on
schedule to
possibly have a decent release for FC4, thanks to Stuart's tireless
efforts.
Well, I *was* tirelessly going in the wrong direction :), and really
should have figured out much sooner that I was expecting the near
impossible. So I'll happily take any brickbats...
Do you know who has the bootloader section? I think that may be one
of the only things left.
Mayank (Sharma) sent me an initial draft, and I'll ping him.
I was also thinking about whether it was worthwhile to change the
name
of this publication from a "guide" to a "handbook," based on its
current
mission to provide a lower level of instruction than the customary Red
Hat Guides. Is this nitpicking, or does anyone
else think there's value in differentiating between the two?
Yes, I think that we should define what sort of document we want this
project to produce (per separate thread on the FAQ, and not competing
with other projects). IIRC, there's a bit of a precedent for
Enterprise and Fedora using different terms to distinguish between the
slightly different deliverables (bug fixes vs. errata).
--
Stuart Ellis