---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ricardo Argüello ricardo@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:01 AM Subject: Re: improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10 To: Development discussions related to Fedora fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Thanks Matthew, this is perhaps one of the most important performance tweaks for Fedora 11 and beyond. We need to add this to the Release Notes or something like that!
Should we close the bug now?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Matthew Garrett mjg@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:54:52AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Huh. I actually meant "shouldn't cause failure" there, in terms of it still being a valid mount option. The improved relatime code adds that heuristic, which avoids the tmpreaper failure. I'm trying to get it upstream, at which point I'll backport it - I'm not enthusiastic about carrying it around as a custom modification forever.
This got merged for 2.6.30 and I've backported it to the rawhide tree. It should also turn up in the 2.6.29 kernel update for F10, but possibly won't be enabled by default there while we work out how to handle the userland transition.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
David Nalley wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ricardo Argüello ricardo@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:01 AM Subject: Re: improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10 To: Development discussions related to Fedora fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Thanks Matthew, this is perhaps one of the most important performance tweaks for Fedora 11 and beyond. We need to add this to the Release Notes or something like that!
I was already following this discussion. Added to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Kernel_Beat
Thanks for forwarding it.
Rahul
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org wrote:
David Nalley wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ricardo Argüello ricardo@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:01 AM Subject: Re: improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10 To: Development discussions related to Fedora fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Thanks Matthew, this is perhaps one of the most important performance tweaks for Fedora 11 and beyond. We need to add this to the Release Notes or something like that!
I was already following this discussion. Added to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Kernel_Beat
Thanks for forwarding it.
Rahul
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
Outstanding - just wanted to make sure we didn't lose it. Thanks for picking it up and actually getting the content in.
2009/3/30 Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org
David Nalley wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ricardo Argüello ricardo@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:01 AM Subject: Re: improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10 To: Development discussions related to Fedora <
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
Thanks Matthew, this is perhaps one of the most important performance tweaks for Fedora 11 and beyond. We need to add this to the Release Notes or something like that!
I was already following this discussion. Added to
pease fix this:
s/This timestamp, called *atime. atime,* can be useful ... /...
Thanks for forwarding it.
Rahul
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list