Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504063
Eric Christensen <eric(a)christensenplace.us> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|kwade(a)redhat.com |eric(a)christensenplace.us
--- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen <eric(a)christensenplace.us> 2009-06-04 13:23:31
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
1) Partly because of Publican weirdness, but also because we were
clinging on
to Gnome help, we manually produced the RPM for f-r-n. How hard do we want to
push to get upstream to produce useable RPMs? My spin is that with a single
document the process is simple enough that getting it fixed in Publican is more
work than just doing it.
I think we've pushed pretty hard to get the RPMs from Publican fixed upstream
and approved by Fedora. I'm not sure what else we need to do to just spit out
the RPMs as I thought all our problems had been solved.
2) If we are going to simply point to an html from the menu, how do
we handle
languages? I know it can be done, I just don't know how. We need to identify
that and document it.
I didn't think we were just going to point to an html. Errr... are we talking
about local html or pointing it to a website somewhere?
3) Is there really any issue with languages once we have the new
Transifex.
I don't think there are any more issues... but I don't know that it's been
tested so I won't say there won't be. Is there a test version of the new
Transifex available?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.