Reading some of these posts on a server guide [Re: Updated Server Guide for
Fedora Core 5], i would like to submit, or rather enquire as to the validity
of adding a guide on wireless internet installation using ndiswrapper, and
also touch on some of the built in wireless support, such as IPW2200...
I have written recently, and refined, a guide for Fedora Core 5, for the
installation and configuration of a wireless network using ndiswrapper, that
includes how to configure WEP/WPA/TKIP security encryption, and how to
install ndiswrapper using yum and repos, manual compiles, and from cvs.
This guide has been the culmination of extensive work, based on problmes
many many people have with wireless internet, and using ndiswrapper. In fact
most dont even know what ndiswrapper is, or what it does, let alone how to
use it. To date, i have yet to see any official fedora instructions for this
type of problem, and only scattered wiki pages that are often mish mashed
together on .
My wireless guide is written in HTML, and is viewable here  and is
detailed and split into sections, for ease of reading. If some one can have
a look over this guide. I would cleans this guide up, and re-write in the
third person, should this guide be of use as an official document. I already
have had my guide linked to a number of times by various places, including
, and also  fedorazine.
I feel this guide could help many more fedora users, and could do with being
made "official", given the lack of information on the web about wireless
unless you know what you are looking for, and how to use it. This guide
simplifies the mass of information into 7 sections that guide you through
preparations to installations and finally configurations, with
troubleshooting, and useful links sections. POlease feel free to comment on
this and let me know what can be done about making this official.
And further, with respect to this:
I usually withhold my more blatant and gushing enthusiasm until such
time as additional folks step up to help whip these documents into
fighting shape. Looking at our contributor list, I see a lot of
names that popped up for roughly five minutes on the mailing list and
then were never seen again.
Would you be interested in joining in the effort? Your enthusiasm
could be contagious if followed up with some elbow grease! :-)
= = =
i have been involved as much as i can, admittidly not as much as i had
hoped, but i actually never thought this guide, or anything else could be of
use. I have an NTFS guide on the same website (listed in my sig) should this
also be of any use, and have many more lined up, which is why i have not
been as active. However i have been trying to edit wikis in the games
sections as often as i can, and work with the docs projects. I am eager to
write more and could to with some guidance from those more experienced. I am
also not adverse to elbow grease, so i think you will enjoy the final
products i produce, under the right guidance and criticisms.
Sorry for the extensive reply, and i hope someone can help guide me, and
comment on this work??
Mr Adam L Moreland (MAniX) | Registered Linux User: #417406
BA (Hons) Media Studies, 2nd Year, UoN
System: Pentium 4 SKT478 2.8GHz Precott, AMD Athlon XP-M 2800+ | GPG Key:
pub 1024D/AC230C32 2006-05-21
Key fingerprint = 14F4 50F5 806C 25A5 B33C C2BF 982C 87B7 AC23 0C32
uid Adam Moreland (MAniX)
sub 2048g/A471FCE7 2006-05-21
From: Miles Brennan <miles(a)brennan.id.au>
Reply-To: For participants of the Documentation Project
To: For participants of the Documentation Project
Subject: Re: Updated Server Guide for Fedora Core 5
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:34:11 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>> 1. The document is licensed as CC BY-NC-SA, so you would need to
>>> relicense it as OPL 1.0  for the Fedora Documentation Project to
I've had a read of the OPL, am I able to choose options with the license?
>>> 2. The document would benefit from style editing.
>> While I don't disagree with your comments,
>> I would be much more enthusiastic about this document.
That's ok, I knew what Paul meant.
> I did use the word "commendable" in there somewhere... ;-) These days,
I did note that ;-) thank you.
> I usually withhold my more blatant and gushing enthusiasm until such
> time as additional folks step up to help whip these documents into
> fighting shape. Looking at our contributor list, I see a lot of
> names that popped up for roughly five minutes on the mailing list and
> then were never seen again.
> Would you be interested in joining in the effort? Your enthusiasm
> could be contagious if followed up with some elbow grease! :-)
> = = =
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Contributors
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/NewWriters
The document didn't get submitted last year because I didn't have time
to bring it up to the latest version (FC4) and to then start preparing
for the next revision before it's scheduled release.
May I suggest that we possibly prepare this document "as is" for FC5,
obvioulsy fixing any major technicalities, and then start working on the
next revision ready for the final release of FC6. This may also allow me
time to finish off the extra 3 chapters on my TODO list.
My wiki account is "MilesBrennan" and my cvsdocs is "mbrennan"
I hope you have a good backup, I have used neither of these before ;-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v126.96.36.199 (MingW32)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
fedora-docs-list mailing list
Windows Live Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free!