On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> wrote:
On Jan 22, 2015 3:56 PM, "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb(a)znmeb.net>
> Renaming "dnf" to "yum" would break enough of my code that
> hard-pressed to justify continuing using and remixing Fedora.
Maybe you should try it, then report back all the edge cases we need to
But seriously, that's exactly the point I was trying to make. It isn't a
drop-in replacement. It behaves differently in many ways, and nobody likes
surprises from their operating system. If you can read the docs first, less
p.s. -obligatory grumble about top posting on lists...
I do plan to migrate my scripts from yum to dnf fairly soon - as soon
as I figure out how to suppress document installs with dnf in a Docker
image. So you'll be getting dnf bug reports if anything breaks in
remixes or Docker images.