[Bug 533737] New: Recommend changing the Feedback statement to include the component name.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Recommend changing the Feedback statement to include the component name.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533737
Summary: Recommend changing the Feedback statement to include the component name. Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: publican-fedora AssignedTo: jfearn@redhat.com ReportedBy: eric@christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: jfearn@redhat.com, fedora-docs-list@redhat.com, nb@fedoraproject.org, mmcallis@redhat.com, r.landmann@redhat.com Classification: Fedora
Eric Christensen eric@christensenplace.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |review?
Created an attachment (id=368073) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=368073) Proposed patch for Feedback.xml
Description of problem: Instead of telling people "When submitting a bug report, be sure to mention the manual's identifier: &BOOKID". It might be better to point them toward the specific component in BZ which just happens to be the same as the &BOOKID (or it should).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0-0.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533737
Jeff Fearn jfearn@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn@redhat.com |r.landmann@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn jfearn@redhat.com 2009-11-27 05:34:34 EDT --- The only issue I can see with this is that anyone using the Fedora brand who doesn't have a component would have incorrect instructions.
This entity isn't used anywhere in the code, so it's purely a cosmetic decision.
Cheers, Jeff.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533737
--- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen eric@christensenplace.us 2009-11-27 09:12:25 EDT --- That's a good point. Although to get a component in Fedora Documentation's BZ product is fairly easy, just ask me for one and I make it happen.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533737
Ruediger Landmann rlandman@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED
--- Comment #3 from Ruediger Landmann rlandman@redhat.com 2010-01-21 09:26:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #2)
Although to get a component in Fedora Documentation's BZ product is fairly easy, just ask me for one and I make it happen.
Yeah; and if a document doesn't have a Bugzilla component, maybe it shouldn't point readers to Bugzilla for feedback?
However, I'm more concerned about this on a pragmatic level, because changing this will require attention from a lot of ranslators -- we have this file complete in around 40 languages!
On that basis alone, I'm closing this DEFERRED for now, but will revisit it when we next need L10N to look at Publican's common content (which will be sometime after the Transifex upgrade).
Cheers
Rudi
-
Red Hat Bugzilla