I wouldn't so much characterize it as a negative, as much as it's in conforming with upstream recommendations (or maybe upstream best practices).
> I saw and replied to that thread a while ago; it contains no work arounds or alternatives to what will be the Fedora 18 boot loader options: all or none, also known as wipe out existing boot loader, or have an unbootable system.
> I have no doubt this will be seen as a major regression (one I agree with, but I think how people should connect the dots ought to be documented). I think work arounds should be documented, other than telling people to use kickstart.
> Chris Murphy
Okay, I'm game for improvement. We can put in a dedicated note to establish grub expectations.
There's a list of things anaconda can't or won't do that might be fitting in the release notes. I've been deliberately vague in this beat on such things because I want readers to get a positive impression of newUI and a bunch of negatives makes that harder. Not impossible, though; I like the new anaconda.