On Mon, Feb 19, 2018, at 5:34 PM, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> Hi all,
> Part of the Docs FAD purpose¹ includes a contributor handbook; in
> CommOps, we are discussing guidelines for GSoC / Outreachy mentors in
> documentation. Is work like this included in the scope of the FAD?
It can be. Our hope was to work more on consumer docs, but I don't see why some community focused docs wouldn't be appropriate. It is a working session after all.
I don't know how much "brainstorming" time you can get or is appropriate though.
> We have a few docs-related areas of focus in CommOps and I hoped to work
> at them during the FAD². However, the scope of work for the FAD is
> unclear to me in this way, if the FAD is meant to focus on tasks like this.
> More context is in this ticket:
> I want to make sure my expectations are in line with reality for the
> FAD, but didn't want to assume. Does it make sense for participants to
> "bring" tasks like this into the FAD?
> ¹ https://fedoraproject.org/
> ² https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/
> Justin W. Flory
> docs mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@lists.
> Email had 1 attachment:
> + signature.asc
> 1k (application/pgp-signature)
docs mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@lists.