On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:09 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:50 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> I'd like to recommend we dump the usage of CED files in favor of the
> local variables designation. The CED file is a pre-compiled DTD subset.
For the record, this is a *complete reversal* of my previous position.
If Dave Pawson is lurking out there, he can laugh at me. The rest of
you who care can swift-kick when you see/meet me next.
After working with the local variable, I am willing to undergo the pain
to change over to it. If there is even any pain.
The only problem is _mixing_ the two formats. If I write using the
Local Variable and you load the CED file, our indenting will be off. At
the least, diffs will be noisy.
OK. If we can agree on this then we can amend the documents that will
be moving into CVS before they get there.
I admit to total self-interest here: the IG has a fair number of files
and will hopefully have multiple people updating it once it's in.
--
Stuart Ellis
stuart(a)elsn.org
GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E 9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA