Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com>, spake thus:
Maybe valid XML would be easier. :-D Should read:
<changelog>
<docrevision>
<date>2005-11-20</date>
<authorinitials>PWF</authorinitials>
<details>Some guff here</details>
</docrevision>
<pkgrevision>
<date>Sat Nov 26 2005</date>
<packager>
<name>Paul W. Frields</name>
<email>stickster at gmail</email>
<details>Fixed OMF</details>
<details>Did something else important</details>
</packager>
</pkgrevision>
</changelog>
I don't really like this <docrevision> / <pkgrevision> stuff. The
"role=doc" or "role=rpm" more succinctly captures the reason for a
particular change having been made. I hope this is not a NIH issue,
but having frobbed around with the XSLT stylesheets a bit, I think I
like my approach better.
How about we keep the CVS versions of the DTD and XSLT stylesheets in sync?
Cheers