-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Where is this, now? I, too, was confused by the generic documentation
path. While certain items are universal, there is a lot of specific
items that I've included in the Fedora Security Guide (on the wiki) that
would NOT work in Ubuntu. There are areas where the guide is quite
specific with commands and such. How is this handled in this new approach?
Thanks,
Eric
E-Mail: sparks(a)fedoraproject.org
GPG Key: D74908ED
Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:30 -0400, Michael Hideo-Smith wrote:
> This documentation effort is about Linux, not just Fedora/Red Hat. I'm
> pulling in some writers from Novell-Suse and Ubuntu to contribute to
> these fedora hosted projects. We all agree that the way to make Linux
> survive is to join our lamps together for greater illumination through
> procedural instruction.
Fair enough, thanks; it just wasn't otherwise clear.
As we continue, I suppose we'll find a way to sort out the distro
specific pieces to inherit.
As it stands, considering the difference between OpenSUSE, Debian, and
Fedora, I don't immediately see what the commonality of content will be.
While the general approach to and architecture for deployment and
security might be similar across those three bases (as examples), the
specifics of implementation are highly distro specific.
Do we need a separate project with the Fedora-specific content? Are you
thinking of combining it in one document base with conditionals?
- Karsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAki91sAACgkQL5V8yddJCO2ryACggN4pdiEqrEFan9I/3q/jNmVT
iWQAnjX2lNUkvcMVDuITC5zmBjhiaUJ4
=AUqc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----