From kwade at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:05:37 2015 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3110653183694946490==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Karsten Wade To: docs at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re:
vs , ... [was: Re: usb-keys] Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:13:52 -0700 Message-ID: <1092420832.4488.35395.camel@erato.phig.org> In-Reply-To: 411CD4D5.4090605@redhat.com --===============3110653183694946490== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 07:48, Mark Johnson wrote: > IMO, use of
makes a document much more modular, in the = > sense that it may later be incorporated into another document. I = > can't recall where, but some 'best practices' presentation/doc I've = > seen recommends moving to
. Yes, I agree. The value that you can get from an explicit section number and associated ID tag are far less than the value of true modularity and the ability to interleave documents. = Since this is all FDL covered materials, we do our own licensing choice a service by making it easier to use our works in a truly free manner. I'd recommend a standard of:
Like The Title: The Details The ID has meaning to the content. When moving chunks if
s around, you can know what something is easily. Want an idea what sections you have in what order? 'grep "