Thank you for the link!
I think that this content would be very useful to Fedora packagers. Do you
think it would be useful to our target audience as well?
Let me just remind the goal of the portal:
"The target audience is developers working on Fedora. To be clear, I am
talking about *developers building *on* Fedora, rather than contributing
*to* Fedora*." 
I am no expert in secondary architectures - just to make it clear.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com
It's difficult to capture whole page in a screenshot, so I am provided a
direct link to access my local running instance of developer portal
. I will try to keep this
link up for at least one day.
We can merge it to " Deploy and distribute" section if we rename it to
something in order to fit information for different architectures. My main
motive behind making Architectures section is to add not only information
about secondary architectures but to have information for Primary and other
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Adam Samalik <asamalik(a)redhat.com
> I would personally like to see it under the 'Deployment' section.
> Why? We currently have four sections:
> 1. Start a project - Creating a project from scratch or deciding which
> technology to use.
> 2. Tools - Tools that can support your development.
> 3. Languages & Databases - The technology we have in fedora.
> 4. Deployment - How to make it run and how to distribute it.
> I think that secondary arches are about 'how to make it running' on a
> specific architecture. We can even rename the 'deployment' section if
> As Miroslav said, it would be great to see examples, which would help us
> decide to where to put it.
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com
>> Hi all,
>> I am waiting for your feedback :)
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com
>>> Post Devconf 2016, I had a short conversation with Petr Hracek
>>> regarding adding content for Secondary architectures in Fedora. I liked
>>> the idea behind developer portal creation and the way currently it looks
>>> Few people know how to work with Fedora Secondary architectures (e.g.
>>> building packages, fixing architecture specific build failures, getting
>>> access to a secondary architecture machines). One of the main reason for
>>> adding Secondary Architectures content is to provide all sorts of required
>>> and updated information to developers or newcomers at one place.
>>> While writing about Secondary Architectures for developer portal, I
>>> noticed that it doesn't fit well in any of the existing sections (taken
>>> from master branch) which is Start a Project, Get tools, Languages &
>>> databases, Deploy and distribute. Meanwhile, I thought why not create a new
>>> section which is dedicated to Architectures in general.
>>> A new section with name Architectures make sense to me where we can
>>> * Information for all architectures on which Fedora deal with
>>> * We can have three sub-sections:
>>> * Primary Architectures - ARM v7, x86_64, i686
>>> * Secondary Architectures - PowerPc, s3909x, AArch64
>>> * Other Architectures - Not yet supported in Fedora e.g. Fedora
>>> Remix for ARM
>>> * Each architectures will be explained separately w.r.t. working with
>>> that arch in Fedora
>>> * Including common build failures in packages and possible reasons of
>>> failures will also be useful for a package maintainers to fix build
>>> failures quickly.
>>> This is a draft proposal as per my working experience with Fedora. I
>>> have worked a bit on it and attached a screenshot in email how this section
>>> would look like. I understand that work is required to make UI consistent
>>> with developer portal.
>>> I would like to get your opinion/ feedback so that further work can be
>>> done to see it available on Fedora Developer Portal.
>> Developer-portal mailing list
> Adam Šamalík
> Associate Software Engineer
> Red Hat
Developer-portal mailing list
Associate Software Engineer
Associate Software Engineer