On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200
> Jakub Filak <jfilak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > a bugzilla ticket  requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text
> > produced by abrt has been filed. Before I start changing the bug
> > summary format I'd like to do a little survey:
> > What would you like see in the bug summaries produced by abrt?
> I actually disagree with the reporter of the bug.
> I prefer to have the component name in the subject of the bug. It's
> true that you can look this up by going to the bug on the web and that
> it's in the initial email, but after that the context of update emails
> is not there, so it's harder for me to know _which_ of the many abrt
> bugs this is.
Please, fix/improve your email client UI. All bugzilla emails
contain all necessary information in email header:
Because opening email headers is indeed so convenient.
For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add
unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bugzilla-Component
This is nice and handy, but I actually don't know many client offering this
/me gonna add this option to his muttrc (lucky that I do use mutt here and
It's pretty common that we don't have component name in BZ
Which does not make it less annoying.