On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 13:51 +0000, Fedora compose checker wrote:
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 15/83 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
ID: 23605 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23605
This is just a needle issue - I think it's what
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D878 is for, actually.
ID: 23606 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23606
This...turned out to be quite a fun one. The immediately observable bug
is that the GNOME Welcome screen doesn't display properly on UEFI live
installs. It should, of course, be incredibly obvious that this is
caused by issues in dracut's FCoE support!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347436
ID: 23611 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23611
ID: 23612 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23612
ID: 23614 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23614
These are all caused by a dependency issue:
nothing provides liburcu-bp.so.2()(64bit) needed by lttng-ust-2.6.2-3.fc24.x86_64
I usually figure someone will spot those on the compose report email and fix 'em.
ID: 23615 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23615
Same old bug that's been around for ages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327460
ID: 23633 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23633
Dep issues installing freeipa-server:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348946
ID: 23635 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23635
Seems to be caused by some kind of dep issue with firefox and GTK+ 2 -
again, I'm just figuring this'll get fixed, if it doesn't in a few
days, will dig in some more.
ID: 23646 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23646
Transient mirror issue, I think.
ID: 23677 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23677
All the '_upgrade_' tests (F24 to Rawhide upgrade) are now failing due
to an SELinux issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349721
Though I think if you check these specific tests, most of them failed
to set up, because the f24 disk images were missing, which I spent
yesterday fixing...anyhow, *now* they're all failing because of that
bug. :P
ID: 23682 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23682
ID: 23700 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23700
More dep issues (including the same one affecting Workstation netinst),
again just giving 'em a few days to get resolved.
ID: 23704 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23704
ID: 23707 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23707
These failed because the disk images were missing, I've resolved all
the various problems I ran into with f24 disk image creation now, and
both prod and stg have the images built.
ID: 23714 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23714
ID: 23715 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23715
ID: 23716 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23716
ID: 23720 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23720
Passed openQA tests: 57/83 (x86_64), 14/17 (i386)
Skipped openQA tests: 10 of 100
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net