On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:45:47AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 06:34:06PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
>>Is this really worth more years of headache? Here are two proposals to
>>deal with this.
>I don't think there is strong enough motivation to rename the packages.
>If Fedora Extras wishes to maintain an "imap" package then they can do
>so without needing to rename libc-client, modulo bug #132928. So I've
>built a libc-client package without the "Conflicts: imap" to fix that
I still maintain that "libc-client" is a horrible name for the package,
but this is technically acceptable at least.
Yes, it would be for almost every package in Fedora. Maybe we could
rename every package to libc-client-xxx, the kernel to
libc-server-yyy, and glibc to libc,the?...
libsomething is a common name, why not change to libimap?