On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:45:55AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> If F31 is delayed by 6 months and F30 is supported for 6 months
> does it mean F29 *also* automatically gets a longer cycle since it by
> policy becomes EOL when F31 is out + 1 month?
> Can we EOL F29 6 months before F31 is out to not have *two* long term
> branches to maintain?
So going back to memory of what we did in the F-21 cycle, we EOLed
F-19 at the 13 months line and then F-20 continued until a month after
F-22 was out.
I'd support doing this again.
Fedora Project Leader