-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Tom Lane wrote:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen(a)redhat.com> writes:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Any chance that in the interim, e2fsprogs-devel could
>> new split out packages (if it doesn't already)?
> For now it only requires libcom_err-devel, from inspection
it looks like
> that's the only set of headers that the e2fsprogs-devel
headers include ...
> I could do this though - but when would it get removed
again; would it
> be better to go with the short sharp shock and just clean it
up in the
> early phase of F12? :)
+1 for just do it. There is not a whole lot of point to
package if dependent packages don't pick up the refactoring.
AFAIR, the only reason postgresql BR's this is because
depended on by krb5, which it uses. I wonder whether the
separate BR is
still needed at all --- shouldn't a BR on krb5-devel be
regards, tom lane
If not, it's a packaging error in krb5.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----