On 02/03/2011 09:42 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:59:07 -0500
Tom Lane<tgl(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> For the last week or so I've been getting broken-dependencies nagmail
> about
>
> mysql-test-5.5.8-6.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(mtr_misc.pl)
>
> The depchecker is correct about that: the RPM built by koji shows an
> unresolved dependency of that form. The question is how that
> dependency is getting past the __perl_requires filter that mysql.spec
> uses, which looks like this:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req $* | \
> grep -v -e "perl(th" \
> -e "perl(lib::mtr" -e "perl(lib::v1/mtr" -e
"perl(mtr"
>
> What makes this especially weird is that the filter is working to the
> extent of successfully removing several other symbols, including some
> that match the "perl(mtr" pattern.
>
> This problem appeared after I built mysql 5.5.8-6 on 20-Jan. The
> dependency filter was working correctly in previous builds, the
> latest being 5.5.8-5 on 13-Jan. When I build the same SRPM locally
> on my Fedora 13 box, no unexpected requires show up in the result.
>
> It's a bit hard to credit that grep itself is broken, not least
> because it doesn't appear to have been rebuilt since October. There
> has been a fair amount of churn in rpm since 13-Jan, though. Should
> I file this as an rpm bug, or is there some other likely explanation?
RPM 4.9 has made changes in the provides/requires extraction code that
are not entirely backwards-compatible. One of these is in respect of
perl dependency extraction where there is now %__perllib_requires as
well as %__perl_requires. So you need to filter that as well as or
instead of (as necessary) %__perl_requires. You'll need to be careful if
you want the spec to be backwards compatible with older rpm versions
though, where %__perllib_requires isn't defined.
Defining %__perllib_requires is safe as older rpm's simply don't use it
for anything. However for rpm 4.9.0 you can use the built-in dependency
filtering instead of redefining the scripts:
%__provides_exclude and %__requires_exclude can used to filter the
results of generated dependencies, and %__provides_exclude_from and
%__requires_exclude_from can be used to exclude entire files from
dependency generation. These operate with regular expressions, eg
to filter all requires with 'mtr' in them you'd use something like
%define __requires_exclude .*mtr.*
or to stop provides generation for, say, private libraries, you could
use something like
%define __provides_exclude_from ^%{_libdir}/mylib/.*\.so$
Yup... the Fedora-specific filtering macros have various unwanted
side-effects (due to using the external dependency generator mode) and
should be phased out now that rpm has built-in support for filtering.
- Panu -