On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:05:56AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > +1 - I'd say a mail to the list *and* directly to each affected
> > maintainer. devel@ is a firehose and some maintainers may not keep up
> > with it.
> isn't devel-announce better fit than devel? Because its description 
> lists "- ABI changes or rawhide package changes that require maintainer
> coordination. "
I think that's probably a judgment call based on how many people will
be affected. If we put too much on devel-announce, it'll have the same
firehose-of-information problem as devel.
Isn't it also moderated? Which would mean the moderator has to be
paying attention and let it through...
I like devel +maintainers directly.