Hi Lubomir,
Thank you for the information! As suggested, I took a look at a couple of package
submissions.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111692
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111691
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111689
Any tips/hints regarding reviews are appreciated!
Regards,
JT
________________________________________
From: devel-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [devel-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org] on
behalf of Lubomir Rintel [lkundrak(a)v3.sk]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:20 PM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: pam_script review
Hi Jason,
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:53 +0000, Jason Taylor wrote:
I've added some comments. If noone else steps in, I can do a formal
review as well.
As indicated in the ticket this is my first packaging attempt so I
am
looking for a sponsor as well. i would obviously like to learn more
about packaging and help maintain packages in addition to my
submission. So if someone happens to have the time to help me learn
the ropes and can sponsor me so I can see about helping out I would
appreciate it! TIA.
Most sponsors (me included) would like to see you do some informal
package reviews. Please have a look at the open reviews and if you
identify any issues with the packages comment on the packages (with a
note that you're not doing a formal review). You can follow up in this
thread with the links to your review comments.
Also, feel free to ask on this list if there's anything unclear about
the guidelines. The guidelines and documentation are huge and the best
way to get familiar with them is reviewing and creating the packages.
Regards,
JT
Have a nice day!
Lubo
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct