On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 08:43 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 15.06.2006, 02:12 -0400 schrieb Dave Jones:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:27:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 14.06.2006, 17:59 +0200 schrieb Phil Knirsch:
> > > [...]
> > > This includes
> > > things like suspend/hibernate and resume, docking stations and
> > > powersaving just to name a few.
> > > [...]
> > This reminds me: Are there any plans to use s2ram in Fedora?
> If anywhere, that magic really belongs in HAL.
> The ubuntu folks seem to agree.
That's okay for me. Are there any efforts in that direction already?
Yeah, see the archives of the hal list over the past month or two.
BTW, managing whitelists and "lists with required workarounds
certain laptops" really sounds like something to me that needs to be
handled somewhere "upstream" -- otherwise each distro would have to
manage its own lists and that wastes a lot of man-power without a real
*nod* This is part of why pm-utils has moved to fdo and there's a list
there. The nice thing about handling the quirking with HAL is that you
can describe the quirks needed just with an FDI file. And in a utopian
future, perhaps vendors will distribute FDI files for their hardware
describing the quirks they need
 Okay, clearly I'm sleep deprived from the freeze process ;-)