hi,
Upstream maintainers believe 5.x is ready for distributions, see thread: http://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-discuss/2011-February/004526.html
5.0.1 was released ONE year ago, and no critical bugs were discovered.
please resubmit to build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=174793
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593612
-thanks-
On 03/19/2011 04:46 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
Upstream maintainers believe 5.x is ready for distributions, see thread: http://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-discuss/2011-February/004526.html
5.0.1 was released ONE year ago, and no critical bugs were discovered.
please resubmit to build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=174793
ping!
5.0.2 was released recently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702919
is there any wrong in 5.x ?
-thanks-
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
On 03/19/2011 04:46 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
Upstream maintainers believe 5.x is ready for distributions, see thread: http://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-discuss/2011-February/004526.html
5.0.1 was released ONE year ago, and no critical bugs were discovered.
please resubmit to build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=174793
ping!
5.0.2 was released recently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702919
is there any wrong in 5.x ?
I have a case where openswan causes a segfault using gmp 5.0.1 on an ARMv4. It seemed to not happen on the fedora-arm architecture using qemu though (but that emulates on ARMv5)
Paul