On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:24 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plautrba(a)redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > today this update:
> >
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14
> > got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent with the
update
> > policies, but that's not the matter here.)
>
> Hi,
>
> upstart-1.x branch is considered as stable and it's recommended update, see [1]
> >
> upstart-1.2-2 hasn't changed upstart behavior. It fixes upstream bugs and also
adds new
> features like new stanzas (manual,debug) and also .override files
> feature adapted from Ubuntu
Hmpf. Does it really make sense updating a packagein a released distro
with features like this? New distros should have new features not old
ones, and with your change you broke F15... .
TBH, if the F15 upgrade replied on a specific version of upstart in F14,
then arrangement should have been made with the upstart maintainer to
coordinate any change.
Where these arrangements made ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York