On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:34:14PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
I've have several review requests that have been sitting around
for a while
now. Many of them are new dependencies for existing packages in
fedora, anyone want to swap?
This a rather unfortunate choice of package name. This proposed package
doesn't actually provide any 'libqmf.so' as the name would suggest, while
Fedora already contains a RPM 'qmf' that does provide a 'libqmf.so'
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://deltacloud.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|