On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Mattias Ellert
<mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se> wrote:
mån 2011-10-31 klockan 19:02 +0100 skrev Till Maas:
> I guess the directory /usr/share/icons/hicolor and the usual
> subdirectories should be owned by the filesystem package.
>
> Regards
> Till
hicolor-icon-theme is a filesystem package. Apart from a README, a
COPYING, a Changelog and one %ghost it contains one (1) file.
And 340 directories.
This is the filesystem package that packages that install icons are
supposed to depend on.
Mattias
That's the answer I needed. Thank you. IMO, this is not clear in the
current packaging guidelines. In fact, the icon cache section says:
"Note that no dependencies should be added for this." It appears that
it is actually talking about not depending on gtk2 or
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache, but that is confusing the issue of
depending on hicolor-icon-theme. Could the packaging committee please
clarify this issue?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/