Please unsubscribe me...
I forgot my password and can't do it myself...
Thanks.
Re: fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51
----- Original Message -----
From: <fedora-devel-list-request(a)redhat.com>
To: <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 4:42 AM
Subject: fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51
Send fedora-devel-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-devel-list-request(a)redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-devel-list-owner(a)redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-devel-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. ctrl-c during boot != good (Dax Kelson)
2. Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Bill Nottingham)
3. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Richard Hughes)
4. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Pete Graner)
5. Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Ian Burrell)
6. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E. Kunkel)
7. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Chris Adams)
8. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E. Kunkel)
9. undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' (Orion Poplawski)
10. Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Thomas M Steenholdt)
11. Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes (Mike Chambers)
12. Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems. (Bojan Smojver)
13. Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Peter Gordon)
14. Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Mark Rosenstand)
15. Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Gilboa Davara)
16. Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23
(Matt Domsch)
17. Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 (Matt Domsch)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:32:40 -0600
From: Dax Kelson <dax(a)gurulabs.com>
Subject: ctrl-c during boot != good
To: notting(a)redhat.com
Cc: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <1158946360.18703.24.camel(a)mentorng.gurulabs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
SysVinit-2.86-12
----------------
* Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> - 2.86-12
- set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung
services (#184340)
I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting
this wrong.
You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up.
Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands
(like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This
is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can
screwup and stop the boot.
I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during
bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
Dax Kelson
Guru Labs
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:49:41 -0400
From: Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good
To: Dax Kelson <dax(a)gurulabs.com>
Cc: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060922174941.GA17495(a)nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Dax Kelson (dax(a)gurulabs.com) said:
> SysVinit-2.86-12
> ----------------
> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> - 2.86-12
> - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung
> services (#184340)
>
> I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting
> this wrong.
>
> You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up.
> Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands
> (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This
> is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can
> screwup and stop the boot.
>
> I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during
> bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
We have multiple requests from people who want to be able to press
ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can *already* interrupt
rc.sysinit.
Bill
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:52:14 +0100
From: Richard Hughes <hughsient(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Cc: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <1158947534.26902.1.camel(a)hughsie-laptop.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys(a)redhat.com wrote:
> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
> ---------------------
> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <alexl(a)redhat.com> - 0.8.1-1.fc6
> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
>
> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
> -----------------------
> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
Anyone else getting this:
(1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB
00:09
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
(2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB
00:00
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum
clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
Known issue? Thanks.
Richard.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:50:14 -0400
From: Pete Graner <pgraner(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
To: richard(a)hughsie.com, Development discussions related to Fedora
Core <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Cc: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <45143066.2060205(a)redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys(a)redhat.com wrote:
>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
>> ---------------------
>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <alexl(a)redhat.com> - 0.8.1-1.fc6
>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
>>
>> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>> -----------------------
>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
>
> Anyone else getting this:
>
> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB
> 00:09
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
> Trying other mirror.
> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB
> 00:00
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
>
> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum
> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
>
> Known issue? Thanks.
>
> Richard.
>
>
Same here. Started last night.
Pete
--
Pete Graner email: <pgraner(a)redhat.com>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:38:44 -0700
From: "Ian Burrell" <ianburrell(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core"
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Message-ID:
<d91f09cd0609221238x36beaa28yb184b6ebb8a9a646(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 9/22/06, Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus(a)tmus.dk> wrote:
>
> It would be really nice if there were some good, universal and simple
> way to see how updated a site mirror is.
>
> One approach that I find to be working well is what debian is suggesting
> for their mirrors (
http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror ). Not only
> does this "trace method" provide info on when the mirror was last
> sync'ed, it also shows the "route" of the mirroring, i.e. what mirror
> this mirror mirrors from (confusing yet true :o)).
>
> Although this does not sort the actual problem of the stale mirrors, it
> will give people an easy way to monitor their own (local?) mirrors and
> perhaps even allow people to select a few often-updated near-by mirrors,
> instead of getting packages from a stale mirror across the ocean.
>
It is fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files.
If the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is
out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the middle
of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the rsync
--delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic.
- Ian
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:46:02 -0400
From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" <clydekunkel7734(a)cox.net>
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
To: richard(a)hughsie.com, Development discussions related to Fedora
Core <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Cc: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <45143D7A.8000008(a)cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, buildsys(a)redhat.com wrote:
>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6
>> ---------------------
>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <alexl(a)redhat.com> - 0.8.1-1.fc6
>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed
>>
>> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>> -----------------------
>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2
>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage
>
> Anyone else getting this:
>
> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB
> 00:09
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
> Trying other mirror.
> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB
> 00:00
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
>
> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum
> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail.
>
> Known issue? Thanks.
>
> Richard.
>
>
Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
# rpm -Uvh
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...
then, yum update.
WFM.
--
Regards,
Old Fart
(my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:53:09 -0500
From: Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>, fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060922195309.GD657887(a)hiwaay.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734(a)cox.net> said:
> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
>
> I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
>
> # rpm -Uvh
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...
It appears to be a problem on the mirror master. I just verified my
mirror is synced and up to the minute (including re-downloading those
two files), and I still get the same error.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:54:42 -0400
From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" <clydekunkel7734(a)cox.net>
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes
To: Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>, Development discussions related
to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>,
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <45144D92.8020903(a)cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734(a)cox.net> said:
>> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and
>>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
>>
>> I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days:
>>
>> # rpm -Uvh
>>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...
>>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...
>
> It appears to be a problem on the mirror master. I just verified my
> mirror is synced and up to the minute (including re-downloading those
> two files), and I still get the same error.
Same here...so,
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/
is not the mirror master?
--
Regards,
Old Fart
(my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:09:07 -0600
From: Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com>
Subject: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled'
To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <ef1jdp$fqd$1(a)sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Just trying to build paraview against libOSMesa.so now that it's made
its return and am getting the following link errors:
/usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled'
/usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to
`security_get_boolean_active'
/usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to
`security_get_boolean_pending'
This is against today's rawhide (mesa-libOSMesa-devel-6.5.1-3.fc6).
Need to explicitly link against -lselinux these days? Should libOSMesa
be linked against libselinux?
/usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so.6.5.1:
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002aaaaaf53000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00002aaaab1d6000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002aaaab3f0000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000)
--
Orion Poplawski
System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301
http://www.cora.nwra.com
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:18:14 +0200
From: Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus(a)tmus.dk>
Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date
To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <ef1jum$hn7$1(a)sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Ian Burrell wrote:
>
> It is fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files.
> If the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is
> out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the middle
> of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the rsync
> --delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic.
>
This does not provide the mirroring trace (which I think would be very
nice), it also says nothing about whether or not the rest of the files
have been mirrored or only the repomd.xml file.
/Thomas
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:37:39 -0500
From: Mike Chambers <mike(a)miketc.com>
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Cc: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <1158961059.2552.1.camel(a)scrappy.miketc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 07:39 -0400, buildsys(a)redhat.com wrote:
> Updated Packages:
> evolution-data-server-1.8.0-9.fc6
> ---------------------------------
> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> - 1.8.0-9.fc6
> - Revise patch for RH bug #198935 (fix a crash reported in bug #207446).
Evo-2.8.0-6 wasn't included in today's build? Guess tomorrow's or on a
people.redhat.com site until then?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Sex is like air, it's not important unless your not getting any!"
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:53:04 +0000 (UTC)
From: Bojan Smojver <bojan(a)rexursive.com>
Subject: Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems.
To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <loom.20060922T234458-491(a)post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Naoki <naoki <at> valuecommerce.com> writes:
> Ahh, indeed the RH repo is fine :
>
> # rpm -Uvh
Actually, it still isn't. You can force all kinds of things by using RPM
directly. Yum, however, will check packages checksum against what it has in its
primary.xml.gz file. For example, here are 3 packages from i386 repository:
-------------------------------------
1a9e25cd7c81e1ce10e2b73dc47a35eed166a698 gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm
2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761 hal-0.5.7.1-3.fc6.i386.rpm
a7b7fd448a2960c355c039297b070fece73f7521 hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm
-------------------------------------
However, primary.xml.gz has:
-------------------------------------
<name>gsf-sharp</name>
<arch>i386</arch>
<version epoch="0" ver="0.8.1" rel="1.fc6"/>
<checksum type="sha"
pkgid="YES">ffadfbeab23ac7ef2d252ae68930ca4283435129</checksum>
<name>hal</name>
<arch>i386</arch>
<version epoch="0" ver="0.5.7.1" rel="3.fc6"/>
<checksum type="sha"
pkgid="YES">2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761</checksum>
<name>hsqldb</name>
<arch>i386</arch>
<version epoch="1" ver="1.8.0.4" rel="3jpp.2"/>
<checksum type="sha"
pkgid="YES">e1131397f0919ff1d04c16b5fcb7be6b82891748</checksum>
-------------------------------------
Two of those three don't match the checksum and yum won't update them. Here are
the errors:
-------------------------------------
(5/38): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3j 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB 00:10
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
(16/38): gsf-sharp-0.8.1- 100% |=========================| 42 kB 00:00
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/...:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
-------------------------------------
--
Bojan
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:10:35 -0700
From: Peter Gordon <peter(a)thecodergeek.com>
Subject: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX?
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4514B3BB.8070801(a)thecodergeek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello, all.
I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy working (odd
since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX
doesn't seem very useful to me, and as I've been having some issues with a few
SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else
that is malfunctioning.
I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found
nothing useful. A google search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing
list from Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in
the
ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in
a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up.
Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks.
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
My Blog:
http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060922/2c...
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:40:47 +0200
From: Mark Rosenstand <mark(a)borkware.net>
Subject: Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX?
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1158990047.833.50.camel(a)mjollnir.borkware.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 21:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy working (odd
> since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX
> doesn't seem very useful to me, and as I've been having some issues with a
few
> SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else
> that is malfunctioning.
>
> I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found
> nothing useful. A google search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing
> list from Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX"
"off"` in the
> ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in
> a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up.
>
> Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks.
I don't think you need to disable it in the server - just either disable
the compositor in metacity, or in the case of compiz, don't launch it.
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:18:27 +0300
From: Gilboa Davara <gilboad(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
<fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1158999507.19122.29.camel(a)gilboa-home-dev.localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 13:49 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dax Kelson (dax(a)gurulabs.com) said:
> > SysVinit-2.86-12
> > ----------------
> > * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> - 2.86-12
> > - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung
> > services (#184340)
> >
> > I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting
> > this wrong.
> >
> > You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up.
> > Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands
> > (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This
> > is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can
> > screwup and stop the boot.
> >
> > I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during
> > bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards.
>
> We have multiple requests from people who want to be able to press
> ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can *already* interrupt
> rc.sysinit.
>
> Bill
>
I second Dax's comment.
Can you make it configurable?
Gilboa
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:25 -0500
From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch(a)dell.com>
Subject: Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23
To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060923034225.A30049(a)humbolt.us.dell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Fri Sep 22 22:20:06 CDT 2006
Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot
starting with FC6test2. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more
information, including the list of packages removed from the default
build chroot.
Note: You will need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6
starting August 28, 2006. See here for more details:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html
Total packages: 1156
Number failed to build: 46
Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 25
Leaving: 21
(there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
Of those expected to have worked...
Without a bug filed: 21
----------------------------------
alacarte-0.10.0-1.fc6
am-utils-6.1.5-4
compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-61
compat-gcc-34-3.4.6-4
control-center-2.16.0-5.fc6
file-roller-2.16.0-2.fc6
gdb-6.5-8.fc6
gnome-media-2.16.1-2.fc6
grub-0.97-12
gthumb-2.7.8-3.fc6
jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1
jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1
kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6
memtest86+-1.65-4.1
nautilus-2.16.0-4.fc6
rhythmbox-0.9.5-4.fc6
syslinux-3.11-4
totem-2.16.1-1.fc6
valgrind-3.2.0-5
xen-3.0.2-36
yelp-2.16.0-3.fc6
With bugs filed: 0
----------------------------------
Full logs at
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
--
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions
linux.dell.com &
www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @
http://lists.us.dell.com
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:34 -0500
From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch(a)dell.com>
Subject: Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23
To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Message-ID: <20060923034234.A30067(a)humbolt.us.dell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Fri Sep 22 22:22:23 CDT 2006
Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot
starting with FC6test2. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more
information, including the list of packages removed from the default
build chroot.
Note: You will need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6
starting August 28, 2006. See here for more details:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html
Total packages: 1157
Number failed to build: 15
Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 10
Leaving: 5
(there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
Of those expected to have worked...
Without a bug filed: 5
----------------------------------
beagle-0.2.10-2.fc6
jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1
jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1
kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6
xorg-x11-drv-via-0.2.1-5
With bugs filed: 0
----------------------------------
Full logs at
http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
--
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions
linux.dell.com &
www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @
http://lists.us.dell.com
------------------------------
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
End of fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51
*************************************************